78 Comments
User's avatar
mile7bar's avatar

The Question about Viruses, Covid-19 etc.? Do they even exist, & if Yes? And, how they, besides the vaccines, make you infertile & poison you with food, drinks & drinking water, too. Their goal is the 90% depopulation of the Earth and the establishment of their jewish-satanic NWO, according to the ancient Talmudic Teaching https://mile7bar.substack.com/p/the-question-about-viruses-covid

Rish's avatar

Most of what they say, has kernels of truth to it, in that:

- yes, it is a viral vector, self assembling nanotechnology, that embeds in the brain and nervous system.

- it is militarised, developed by DARPA and co.

- a lot of information relating to it, is classified, and behind the national security veil.

It is primarily a neurobiological control and surveillance tool, and capabilities can be 'turned on' in a person of interest.

It intersects with 'terorrist' type surveillance databases, and an individual can be tracked (like a GPS), monitored (like a walking-talking mobile phone) and can be interrogated

- interrogation is done in the 'sleep state' via dream manipulation, referred to as 'enhanced interrogation'

- bodily functions cannbe affected (anything on the hormonal level)

- some have reported direct energy weapon hits (read up on Havana syndrome, to understand the capability)

- and yes, an individual can be disabled and killed.

All wirelessly, using an already worldwide bio-cyber-medical wireless grid.

Alix Mayer's avatar

Debbie. Excellent. Best explanation thus far. This is why Sasha reported that a whistleblower at Moderna saw DoD employees, with special clearance to a DoD building at Moderna, bring bags of COVID juice so that Moderna could put the LNP around it. Dr Patrick Soon- Shiong mentioned not being able to get “bags” of the main (DoD secret) ingredients in the covid shots.

GreaterIsrahell's avatar

There is something on the "Comparison of Access Machanisms" form I saw just now.

Line five: Informed consent required.

Clinical trial - Yes

Expanded Access (IND/IDE) - Yes

EUA - No, but requires informing the VOLUNTEER of 1) right to refuse and 2) that product is unapproved/available under an EUA.

How many people who got the clot shot was informed of this? In particular the part about it being available under an EUA. I think nobody.

Everyone in the medical freedom movement needs to understand all of line five.

Nicole C. Scott's avatar

Wrote this back in January. There are many reasons to challenge the act. At the very least, it should be amended by the HHS Secretary to pierce the shield based on clear harm criteria. Passing a bill to revoke it therafter, is also prudent. For that matter, a bill should be passed banning pestilence profiteering schemes entirely. https://open.substack.com/pub/inalienablesovereignty/p/upholding-constitutional-and-human

patrick.net/memes's avatar

RFK Jr just revoked the EUA, but sadly seems to have approved the mRNA death jabs outside of that.

So nothing really changed. Pfizer can still kill people for cash with zero liability.

Stephen Dedalus's avatar

Ms. Lerman, have you researched the so-called Comirnaty bait-and-switch? My memory is that somewhere around mid-summer 2021 in had become obvious that the number of low hanging fruit—initial mRNA recipients—was depleting and everyone else was pulling back as it became apparent that the dangers were completely overblown. Employers, including mine at the time, were reporting that employees were demanding something equivalent to workers compensation in the event of vax injury because they obviously understood quite clearly that there was great risk associated with what many knew to be an experimental “vaccine.” Then, suddenly, Pfizer comes out that summer and says that, oh yes, they have now introduced a “legally distinct” product (marketed as Comirnaty) that informed critics recognized as being essentially identical to the EUA “Bio N Tech” product. Shortly thereafter the FDA approved Comirnaty, effectively taking it off the protected liability status. Then the employers came back to their employees and said, hey, it’s not experimental anymore, therefore you have no excuse, go get the shot or you’re fired! But here’s my understanding of the bait-and-switch that I was hoping that you can confirm: The word was that Pfizer never really offered Comirnaty in the United States because they didn’t want the associated liability. You could walk down to your corner pharmacy as say, hey give me the new approved mRNA shot, and they would pull out a vial of Bio N Tech. They’d say something like we’re just working through the old stock but trust us “it” has been FDA approved. The whole thing was just another level of manipulation and deception to get people through the door. Are you able to confirm? There was a lot of disinformation during that period.

Stephen Dedalus's avatar

Save yourself the effort. My memory is confirmed. Refer to the *Defender* substack concerning the case of Watts v. DOD, published August 29.

svartberg's avatar

They are a unit 8200 kill shot that work slowwwly…

GeoffPainPhD's avatar

Pfizer should never have been given EUA.

In 2020 a Pfizer Clinical Trial subject, 56-year-old man who was given Placebo, contracted Pneumonia 17 days after receiving the second dose of Saline, and was rescued with a combination of drugs including Ivermectin, which was stopped when he tested negative for Covid19

https://geoffpain.substack.com/p/pfizer-knew-ivermectin-protects-against

Tonya's avatar

Look at that chart—none of the rigor of clinical trials (poor as it is), but complete access to every single human being, aged 6 months and up.

Duchess's avatar

Debbie, have not had a chance to thank you for all this effort and work.

Thank you...from the bottom 9f my heart

Thomas A Braun RPh's avatar

What more do we need to know to stop all RNA injections and cancel EAU now and not wait till 2030! Currently, Big Pharma is now developing programs to sell their RX drugs directly to

Americas who perceive they need a Big Pharma drugs like GLP1. Direct selling bypasses the community physician and the community pharmacist. Safe guards for keeping patients safe are being eliminated in this process. Direct Selling will end if EAU and PERK is eliminated. Big Pharma doesn't want that since they see direct selling as their control mechanism.

The struggle will go on as long as Big Medicine has influence over our Congressman and our NIH employees who cater to Big Pharma goals. Cassidy and Blumenthal are fine examples of their thought leaders in DC to control the direction of medicine for profit and not good health goals. Transitioning from a sickcare system to a true healthcare system is a major challenge for RFK Jr. who has been given that responsibility. President Trump needs to focus on this challenge, but is focused on finding peace in this world and reversing the degradation of America.

Lance Dreiss's avatar

Since it’s considered a bioweapon doesn’t it make sense (B biological) they would use countermeasures for a bioweapon? The PREP act is definitely unconstitutional. Let’s hope Senator Massie gets rid of the PREP Act because everyone involved is putting their hope in not being caught, or at least held accountable, because of this Act. Murder is NOT legal. We will get those who participated if we are here long enough. If not the Almighty says, “vengeance is mine.”

Rish's avatar

It's a countermease for biological freedom