Given Daszak's own argument and prescient writings, is it plausible that his GoF work on "Disease X" was put in the Wuhan lab precisely because 1) of the proximity of the lab to markets where nature and man came together and 2) that lab did not have the highest security. What I'm getting at is this: was Wuhan chosen on purpose in order to ensure first, a leak, then a pandemic, and finally the use of a countermeasure to combat it? Is that level of coordination and forethought this likely? My level of lack of trust caused by the lying about everything covid has reached epic proportions and I sometimes find myself questioning my own sanity.
I, too, question my sanity every day! I think those suspicions about the virus being intentionally exported to/released from the lab in Wuhan are completely valid and not crazy at all, but I do not have any evidence to support them.
Although I am now one of the most paranoid people I know, I try in my work not to guess or assume anything about people's intentions. All I can know for sure are their actions and the results of those actions. And I think those are bad enough -- even if it was just an accidental leak of an engineered virus that was seized upon by the biowarfare-industrial-complex to put all their plans into action -- that would still be very very bad, especially since one of their top goals (I would argue it was the top, but there were others as well) was to get mRNA "technology" out of unsuccessful clinical trials (where it was destined to stay forever, because said technology is neither safe nor effective) and into the global marketplace. The fact that they did this by completely bypassing the entire clinical trial process, good manufacturing practices and regulatory oversight means BY DEFINITION that they were willing to put the public's life and health at risk. That is enough of a crime against humanity for me. Others would say it was an intentional attempt to kill and maim people. I understand why so many people believe that. And I understand that they think I'm naive or willfully blind to the true evil of our globalist overlords. I'm OK with that.
It's OK if we diverge on interpreting the motives of the evildoers, as long as we are all working to expose the evil and alert as many people as possible, so they can resist next time. At least that's my goal in doing this work. Also maintaining what's left of my sanity. :)
Given Daszak's own argument and prescient writings, is it plausible that his GoF work on "Disease X" was put in the Wuhan lab precisely because 1) of the proximity of the lab to markets where nature and man came together and 2) that lab did not have the highest security. What I'm getting at is this: was Wuhan chosen on purpose in order to ensure first, a leak, then a pandemic, and finally the use of a countermeasure to combat it? Is that level of coordination and forethought this likely? My level of lack of trust caused by the lying about everything covid has reached epic proportions and I sometimes find myself questioning my own sanity.
I, too, question my sanity every day! I think those suspicions about the virus being intentionally exported to/released from the lab in Wuhan are completely valid and not crazy at all, but I do not have any evidence to support them.
Although I am now one of the most paranoid people I know, I try in my work not to guess or assume anything about people's intentions. All I can know for sure are their actions and the results of those actions. And I think those are bad enough -- even if it was just an accidental leak of an engineered virus that was seized upon by the biowarfare-industrial-complex to put all their plans into action -- that would still be very very bad, especially since one of their top goals (I would argue it was the top, but there were others as well) was to get mRNA "technology" out of unsuccessful clinical trials (where it was destined to stay forever, because said technology is neither safe nor effective) and into the global marketplace. The fact that they did this by completely bypassing the entire clinical trial process, good manufacturing practices and regulatory oversight means BY DEFINITION that they were willing to put the public's life and health at risk. That is enough of a crime against humanity for me. Others would say it was an intentional attempt to kill and maim people. I understand why so many people believe that. And I understand that they think I'm naive or willfully blind to the true evil of our globalist overlords. I'm OK with that.
It's OK if we diverge on interpreting the motives of the evildoers, as long as we are all working to expose the evil and alert as many people as possible, so they can resist next time. At least that's my goal in doing this work. Also maintaining what's left of my sanity. :)